Why do people fail to consider alternative hypotheses in judgments under uncertainty?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Two experiments examined theoretical accounts of why people fail to consider alternative hypotheses in judgments under uncertainty. Experiment 1 found that a majority of participants failed to spontaneously search for information about an alternative hypothesis, even when this required minimal effort. This bias was reduced when a specific alternative was mentioned before search. Experiment 2 showed that when participants were given the likelihoods of the data given a focal hypothesis p(D|H) and an alternative hypothesis p(D|¬H), they gave estimates of p(H|D) that were consistent with Bayesian principles. The results show that neglect of the alternative hypothesis typically occurs at the initial stage of problem representation. However judgments are more consistent with Bayesian norms when they involve utilizing information about a given alternative.
منابع مشابه
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Consider the Alternative: The Effects of Causal Knowledge on Representing and Using Alternative Hypotheses in Judgments Under Uncertainty
متن کامل
The poverty of media richness theory: explaining people's choice of electronic mail vs. voice mail
How and why people choose which communication medium to use is an important issue for both behavioral researchers and software product developers. Little is yet known about how and why people in organizations choose among new media like electronic mail and voice mail, although the availability and use of new media are increasing dramatically. Media richness theory (MRT) is the most prominent, i...
متن کاملReconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.
People have strong intuitions about the influence objects exert upon one another when they collide. Because people's judgments appear to deviate from Newtonian mechanics, psychologists have suggested that people depend on a variety of task-specific heuristics. This leaves open the question of how these heuristics could be chosen, and how to integrate them into a unified model that can explain h...
متن کاملPolymorphism of Human Judgment under Uncertainty
The aim of this paper is to test if conjunctive and disjunctive judgments are differently accounted for possibility and probability theories depending on whether (1) judgments are made on a verbal or a numerical scale, (2) the plausibility of elementary hypotheses is low or high. 72 subjects had to rate the extent to which they believe that two characters were individually, in conjunction or in...
متن کاملAFFECT PROBABILITY JUDGMENT ? THE DISCRIMINATION BIAS Amber Sprenger
Title of thesis: CAN IRRELEVANT ALTERNATIVES AFFECT PROBABILITY JUDGMENT? THE DISCRIMINATION BIAS Amber Sprenger, Master of Science, 2005 Thesis directed by: Professor Michael Dougherty Department of Psychology In this paper we used a proactive interference (PI) paradigm to examine the effect of generating irrelevant alternative hypotheses on probability judgments. Two possible effects of gener...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015